Immer wieder ein Erlebnis wie lange so ne Flasche manchmal braucht. Aber vor Weihnachten wird’s bestimmt noch was 
Das mit dem Vergleich macht Sinn. Jetzt bereue ich den nicht Kauf. 
Hab mein sample doch schon leer. 
8 Likes
Simple math 
4 Likes
Here’s why it matters 
9 Likes
Aber worlds oldest is ja Quatsch wenn ich mir so manche 70Y+ Kuba releases anschaue… Typisches Marketing Blabla der Artikel
6 Likes
It depends how the manufacturer can use the time spent in casks om the label of the bottles.
In the whisky industry in the EU and UK, only the youngest whisky may be used for an age statement. In port wine, it’s some sort of an average which is used.
If one would be allowed to use the oldest whisky that is in a vatting or a blend, then it’s “relatively easy” to use 70+.
But don’t think that it would be an honour to drink a spirit that was in a first fill / fresh cask for 70 years. It would be too woody. I know that Glenfarclas uses 4th fill casks for this, where the wood is not that active.
No clue what Appleton used. With such a climate, I think they must have used almost drained casks, which were not treated (hence not charred or toasted).
To me, the article finally shows some humbleness from someone in the Scotch whisky industry to other spirits. This alone is already very positive 
10 Likes
Also probably they use some kind of reracking in Cuba meaning they’re consolidating multiple casks into one over the years. Here this is the same cask that went all over from the beginning so I guess that’s what they mean…
3 Likes
72.1% 
it should need special flammable shipping option 
Any idea from where the MAIC10 mark comes from?
Edit : Beenleigh, same year as RX15566 and RX20515
13 Likes
Direkt Rum Cola für @zabo abgefüllt
6 Likes
Der Farbe nach würde ich auf einen 94er REV tippen, wenn ich ernsthaft raten müsste
3 Likes
12 Likes
Ist ein 2014er REV 
12 Likes
Da ist man damals beim zugeben der Melasse bei der Menge scheinbar um ne Kommastelle verrutscht 
2 Likes
Geilo da wird sicherlich wieder ne Party am Wagemut stand abgehen mit face shots beim GRF
4 Likes
Wer’s braucht 
7 Likes
Dann halt wieder für 2500€ bei ebay 
5 Likes
Wenn’s reicht 
2 Likes
So much marketing drivel.
2 Likes
The ad ridden nature of Forbes.com says it all. The article, which is just a PR piece, is barely readable because of all the pop ups.
Forbes is notorious for ill informed lists and “hot”takes that rarely have any reflection of the genuine enthusiasm around quality releases. Their audience is wealthy business folks looking to buy their way into credibility without actually investing any real time or energy.
5 Likes